to Stove or not to Stove …

Hendrik Morkel waxes philosophic on a most practical matter:

… I’m convinced that it is on average lighter to go with an UL stove and dehydrated food, as I reckon it will be tastier and give more (mental) energy. …

Hiking in Finland – Food for Thought: Stoveless backpacking

I like that conclusion. I normally have 2-3 hot coffees in the morning, a cold lunch — and a big hot meal after dark.

My stove of preference is still the MSR Reactor.

Should I go to something lighter? 🙂

Hendrik links to these related posts:

Going stoveless / Hiking no-cook PART II (PCT)

• TrailSavvy – Alternative Menu Planning (Stove-less)

3 Replies to “to Stove or not to Stove …”

  1. The main goal is to be happy, so people should do whatever they like!

    But if the goal is to be efficient, then there is no question the alcohol burning cat can stove ($0) is the way to go. Water comes to a boil just as the fuel runs out, and dry food is added (no simmer).

  2. Personally I can’t be without hot food on a long hike. I love my little msr pocket rocket. Weighs next to nothing and the rain doesn’t seem so bad if you’ve a cup of tea in hand!

Leave a reply to Phil Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.